Online users are now stating that the Academy Award–winning actor Mel Gibson is “losing his marbles” for speculating that the deadly fire was “commissioned” to force people from valuable property. This comes after Gibson’s home in California was destroyed by the flames in Los Angeles.
Thousands of people in the Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles have been impacted by the recent fire that occurred there, which has caused devastation and anguish.
According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the wildfires that broke out in Los Angeles on January 7 had consumed over 40,660 acres, burned approximately 12,500 structures, and claimed the lives of at least 24 people.
Mel Gibson, an actor, was one of the people who was profoundly affected by the fire. On January 10, while he was recording an edition of Joe Rogan’s podcast, Gibson discovered that his Malibu mansion, which was valued at $23.5 million, had been destroyed by the fire.
Since then, the actor who played Braveheart participated in a chat with Laura Ingraham, a host on Fox News, in which he discussed his experience and sentiments regarding the tragedy.
The things that my son took with him, which included things like passports and a few of paperwork, are fine. He grabbed about three things and ran away.According to Gibson, who spoke to Fox News, “[but] it’s tragic, and it makes you really sad.”
He misplaced a number of objects, including priceless works of art, photos, and rare books that dated back to the 1600s. In the midst of contemplating these irreplaceable artifacts, Gibson referred to the tragedy that it brought about as “purification.”
They described their feelings as “a strange mixture of sadness and almost kind of an elation,” and they went on to say that the house and goods that they lost in the fire were nothing more than “things” that “may or may not be replaceable but they’re only things.”
A comparison was made between the catastrophic devastation of his property and the bombing of Dresden, a city in Germany that was completely destroyed during World War II. The Mad Max star made this comparison.
He continues by saying, “We are still here, and I just kind of look at it almost in a weird kind of way as purification.”
A covert plan, if
During his visit on the show, the actor, who is 69 years old, presented his ideas regarding the terrible fire that claimed thousands of homes, including his own, and questioned the possibility that the fire was caused by malicious intent.
“I am aware that they were causing problems with the water by releasing reserves for a variety of reasons on their own. They have been doing that for quite some time. The actor was asked about a possible covert agenda, and he responded by saying, “The state of California has a lot of problems that kind of baffle the mind for why they do things.”
Gibson’s theory originates from his conviction that the wildfire may have been ignited on purpose for the purpose of gaining financial or political advantage. He believes that some strong individuals or entities could be responsible for the blaze.
Gibson tells the presenter, “I can make all kinds of horrible theories up in my head, conspiracy theories and everything.” This is followed by a hint that the fires were “commissioned” and purposely lit. In addition, that the wind conditions were favorable, and that there are individuals who are ready, willing, and able to start fires.
The star of “Lethal Weapon” later questioned if the individuals who were allegedly responsible for starting the fire were “commissioned” or “just acting on their own volition.”
“It is a fact,” Gibson asserts.
Immediately providing an explanation for his “insane” theory, Gibson asked Ingraham, “Is it on purpose, which is an insane thing to think about this.” The question of whether or not there is a purpose in mind starts to be given some thought. What could it possibly be? I’m curious, what is it that they want? Is the state desolate? Oh, I have no idea.”
After taking the bait, the presenter answered by saying, “And obviously, there is a great need for high density housing in California and across the country.” This is a significant effort on the part of those concerned with the environment.
Furthermore, she continues, “And you are already hearing rumblings of that.” Say farewell to single-family homes in this particular scenario. High-density housing, how are you doing?
Gibson then made a reference to “cattle barons,” which is a phrase that dates back to the 19th century and was used to characterize wealthy landowners who are responsible for clearing land for ranching. He stated that the idea is “pretty scary.”
It makes me think of the old cattle barons who were responsible for removing people off the land. I have no idea…That there was no water was merely something that seemed to be a little bit convenient.
“The characteristics of the wind, as well as the fact that there were individuals who were prepared, willing, and able to start fires.” Additionally, are they doing on their own volition or have they been given a specific order to carry out this task?
“Meetings of the truth”
Just as was to be expected, Gibson’s words have elicited a variety of responses. He was praised by some of his supporters on social media for his courageous decision to speak up against what they see to be realities that have been ignored.
“He has the guts to tell the truth,” writes one internet user in the comments section of the Fox clip where the clip was posted. A second person, who is expressing their approval of the actor’s assertions, writes, “Fabulous words of TRUTH from Mel Gibson – AGAIN!!!”
“Mel is one of the very few courageous entertainers with morals and conscience, that speaks truths that others dare not,” says a third person, praising the celebrity for her ability to speak the truth. And yet another person comments, “Mel, keep kicking the system in the guts, the world needs to hear the truth!”
“Zombie of the conspiracy”
Critics, on the other hand, have been quick to suggest that his assertions are without foundation and reckless, with some even saying that he has gone too far.
This is completely insane. At this point in time, it would be inappropriate to promote rumors of a conspiracy concerning such a terrible event. One dissatisfied user of the internet expresses their opinion that “I am not even sure any time is really appropriate.” The fact that people are losing their lives and homes is a time for compassion, not a time for conspiracies.
“What crazy does is what crazy does! A second person says, “Mel, you’ve been in need of assistance for a very long time; go and get it.” In agreement with that sentiment, a third individual comments, “He ought to obtain assistance…I am at my wit’s end with these zombies of conspiracies.
An another person says, “Damn. The homeboy is completely losing his mind.
Note that there is no evidence to substantiate any of the conspiracy ideas that have been proposed.